1. Decision of the Supreme Court of India (“SC”) concerning conversion of upper floors for commercial use in Delhi, the legal basis, reasoning, and implications.

---

Facts & background

• The case arises from the long-running public interest litigation M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors. relating to unauthorised construction, misuse of residential premises, sealing and conversion of properties in Delhi. (LiveLawcompany.com)

• The specific matter concerned a property (Plot No. 106, New Rajinder Nagar Market, Delhi) where the ground floor was used as a shop (commercial) and upper floors purported to be residential but were being used commercially. The owner challenged sealing and sought de-sealing. (Science and Technology Ministry)

• Under the relevant planning regime for Delhi (notably the Master Plan for Delhi – 2021, abbreviated MPD-2021) there are specific land-use categories of Local Shopping Centres (LSCs) and Convenience Shopping Centres (CSCs). In “shop-cum-residence” complexes (mixed use) the upper floors may be residential by default and only the ground floor commercial unless conversion is properly done. 

---

Legal holding of the Supreme Court

The SC held, in summary:

1. Even if upper floors are eligible for commercial use conversion, such conversion can only happen if the owner pays the prescribed “conversion charges” to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). (Live Law Company)

2. If upper floors meant for residential use are being used commercially without payment of conversion charges (and without fulfilling the proper process), the sanction for commercial use does not automatically follow, and such use is unauthorised. (https://livelawcompany.com/)

3. The Court also observed that if the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) built exceeds the sanctioned FAR (or the permissible FAR under the applicable scheme) then regularisation / penalty may be required before conversion is granted. (https://livelawcompany.com/)

4. In the particular case the SC rejected the application seeking de-sealing of the property and refused to permit use of the upper floors as commercial unless conversion charges + penalties (for excess FAR etc) are paid and unlawful constructions removed. (Verdictum)

From the judgment:

“The upper (residential) floors though eligible for conversion (to commercial space), it can happen only with payment of the conversion charge.” (Bar and Bench – Indian Legal news)

---

Reasoning & rationale

• The Court emphasised that planning norms and zoning classifications (such as LSCs, CSCs) have to be respected, since they reflect infrastructure capacity, traffic, parking, services etc. The mere fact that a market has grown historically does not override the need for following the regulatory framework.

• The MPD-2021 categorises LSCs into “planned LSC” (where all floors may be commercial) and “designated LSC” (where only ground floor commercial, upper floors residential by default, but convertible after payment). In the case, New Rajinder Nagar was held to be a “designated LSC”. 

• The requirement of conversion charges is tied to the fact that converting residential floors to commercial imposes greater burdens (traffic, parking, services) and so needs regulatory oversight and fee to account for the change in use.

• The Court also emphasised that prior documents (lease, conveyance, sanctioned plan) reflected the upper floors in that case were for residential use, and so use as commercial without conversion was unauthorised. 

---

Implications

• For property-owners in Delhi who have “shop-cum-residence” type properties: if the upper floors are being used commercially without paying conversion charges, risk of sealing / unauthorised use arises.

• Municipal authorities (MCD) are empowered to demand conversion charges and penalties for excess FAR etc before permitting commercial use of upper floors.

• It clarifies that a blanket committee order cannot override individual factual examination of each property’s sanctioned plan, lease/deed, and approved usage. (https://livelawcompany.com/)

---

What the decision does not do

• It does not say that all upper floors can never be commercial. It acknowledges they can be converted — but only if proper process (conversion fee, approval, regularisation) is followed.

• It does not automatically regularise all historic conversions; each case must be examined for sanctioned plan, FAR compliance, payments done.

• It does not mean that the ground floor is always commercial and upper always residential in every market — in “planned LSCs” the entire building may be commercial (if designated as such) under MPD.

---

Key take-away summary

In short: for Delhi properties within mixed-use markets (shop-cum-residence), the upper floors which are originally residential cannot be lawfully used for commercial purposes unless the owner pays the conversion charges to MCD (and addresses any excess FAR or unauthorised construction) and obtains the necessary approval. The Supreme Court has upheld that principle in its recent ruling.

---